Site changes | May17 |
![]()
I made some updates to this site today.
It’s been almost two years since I set about building my own blog from scratch: partly because I wanted to get started blogging, and partly to teach myself CSS and modern HTML (having last built a site at 14 years old using frames, and then tables). I didn’t want an entire redesign from scratch, so I kept the basic paper-on-wood look, but cleaned it up a bit. The above image is the Photoshop draft of the last version.
I figured it was time for a lick of paint for two reasons: firstly, I’d like to blog more (though we’ll so how long that lasts); secondly, it’s been a long time since I’ve done any web design and the skills needed a workout before I forgot everything.
All in all, I enjoy this kind of work. Solving a niggling problem in CSS feels great, like figuring out the solution to a particularly tricky puzzle. I’m sure my code is full of hacks and inefficiencies (and likely redundant rules for the old version), but I view the effort of coding this site as an education in basic web design. Emphasis on basic.
Powered by ExpressionEngine, font replacement by Cufón using Glypha, and using the iPhone GUI of Leehan + Tax. Indebted to Envato’s From Photoshop to HTML for teaching me how.
Posted by in •Tech(0) Comments | Permalink
Days spent on Finance Bills 2010 & 2011 | Jan28 |
(0) Comments | Permalink
Who’s been talking about elections? | Dec17 |

Words are a lot of fun.
I was reading RTÉ news and spotted Eamon Gilmore criticising the government and making reference to the election, which it struck me he’s been doing a lot of lately. So I moseyed over to the fantastic KildareStreet.com to have a look at exactly how much he’s been saying it.
169 times this year, as it turns out.
As a matter of fact, he’s used the word election this year so much that it accounts for 48% of every use of the word by him since 2004. Compare that to Cowen, at 32% (and take into account he’s announced it and answered questions on it, so he hasn’t always been bringing the topic up) or Kenny at 34%, and it seems like Gilmore has his eyes on the prize.
Now, obviously there aren’t any earth-shattering conclusions to be drawn, but like I said, words can be fun.
Interesting nugget: none of the party leaders use the word “election” most. That honour goes to John Gormley (preying on his mind, perhaps?) followed closely by Micheál Martin.
Posted by in(0) Comments | Permalink
Journalists of Tomorrow? Where? | Nov25 |
So, Tomorrow’s News, Tomorrow’s Journalists is closing down, apparently. The ring, part of the excellent journalism.co.uk site, was intended to be a place where future journalists could share ideas and discuss the future of journalism with one another: a vibrant community where those most affected by the rapid changes in journalism could have their say.
If you visit it today, that’s not what you’ll see.
The site’s barren, and the lack of interest in supporting it has left journalism.co.uk editor Laura Oliver with no option but to shut it down. I used to be a contributor, and popped along recently to catch up on the debates and maybe start writing a little again. After all, it’s driven more traffic to this blog than any other activity of mine. But what’s there is little changed since I left. Worse, a lack of maintenance appears to have left the site with a bunch of broken links.
But the most disheartening thing is that Laura, who took on the job when previous editors went and got hired by major news organisations, did her part getting the word out there and recruiting interested parties, and they just didn’t care enough when it became clear it would actually involve sitting down and writing. She claims that she had more than enough sign-ups, and that people just didn’t deliver.
@davemolloy Hi Dave - Oct debate q was posted but had no responses despite 100s of sign ups - unfortunately am going to have to kill it
...
@davemolloy it’s a real shame, but it may be a time thing - lots of interest, then people went back to uni/training
Now, I’ll accept that I haven’t contributed a post in a long time. But this really, really annoys me. I should have been pushed out due to inactivity by brighter, better, younger stars. On one of the most prominent UK industry sites, they can’t attract people willing to contribute a few hundred words once a month? And this business is supposedly over-saturated with talented people who just can’t get a break?
Bullshit.
I’m seeing this elsewhere, too. At Una Mullally’s excellent Dancing About Architecture (a music journalism lecture series) over the past four weeks, I’ve seen the apathy so-called hopeful journalists have in abundance. The venue was packed to the rafters on week one with an extensive waiting list, yet by the end, the wind and rain of a cold November meant that many didn’t bother to turn up. I was sick myself one week, but it was clear that many people who had reserved a place simply didn’t bother. And they missed some excellent stuff, with week three being positively inspirational.
I’m working a day job 9-5 to pay the bills and not spending nearly as much time as I would like, and really, as I need to, on my fledgling journalism career. I’m not working hard enough, and that’s my own fault. But when I see this kind of lark, I stop worrying and kicking myself, because I’m probably still doing more than most of these people. It’s easy to say you’re going to work in the industry, but clearly, many just aren’t that interested.
Jokers.
If you’re looking for an excellent young journalist’s discussion/blog/source of info, I highly recommend http://wannabehacks.wordpress.com/, five lads trying to break into journalism by different methods.
Posted by in •Journalism(3) Comments | Permalink




